
Artificial intelligence and stablecoins have become essential tools for corporate treasuries, changing how money moves and financial operations are handled.
AI as a productivity partner, not a replacement
At this year’s Treasurers Roundtable in Washington, AI led discussions about liquidity and operational efficiency. The technology is not seen as a threat to treasury teams but as a means to automate many of the manual, repetitive, and often time-consuming tasks that consume so much of the treasury function. This shift allows treasurers to spend less time on administration and more time applying the oversight and strategic thinking that technology cannot replace.
This change is significant. Treasury functions have long treated workflows and payment processes as fixed constraints. AI challenges that view, offering ways to rethink how work is done without removing the human judgment needed for risk assessment and decision-making.
Some resistance persists due to concerns about job loss. The actual role of AI is simpler: it handles administrative tasks, not the detailed analysis treasurers provide.
Stablecoins move from niche to mainstream
While AI improves operations, stablecoins are changing how value is transferred. Global stablecoin transactions exceeded $34 trillion in 2025. In Sub-Saharan Africa, they made up 43% of all cryptocurrency transaction volume, with more than $300 billion in on-chain value moving through the region in recent years. A survey found 79% of African respondents held stablecoins, the highest ownership rate worldwide.
Related: AGOA Lifts Apparel Exports But Fails to Boost Textile Industry
Nigeria and South Africa drove much of this growth. Yet adoption among corporate treasuries remains inconsistent. Many African businesses are still exploring use cases, while companies elsewhere have already integrated stablecoins into cross-border payments and liquidity management. The difference stems from infrastructure and regulatory clarity.
The advantages are clear: faster settlements, lower costs, and reduced dependence on traditional banking intermediaries. However, challenges remain. Most stablecoins are dollar-denominated, creating foreign exchange risks for companies operating in non-dollar markets. Converting local currency to dollars and back introduces volatility and compliance issues, particularly in regions with strict exchange controls.
Regulation adds complexity. Africa’s digital asset policies differ widely. Some nations have adopted stablecoins, while others remain hesitant or outright restrictive. For treasuries operating across borders, this patchwork of rules complicates compliance and raises the risk of errors.
Cost is another hurdle. Implementing stablecoins requires investment in new systems and staff training. For treasuries already stretched thin, the decision isn’t just about whether the technology works—it’s about whether the disruption justifies the benefits.
This isn’t the first time treasury functions have faced technological change. The shift from paper-based processes to digital banking met similar skepticism. Early adopters gained efficiency advantages, while others struggled to keep up. The difference today is the pace of change. Stablecoins and AI are reshaping operations now.
Related: New York Times fights Air Force One subpoenas
Risk and opportunity in equal measure
Fraud and regulatory uncertainty rank as top concerns. Stablecoins, despite their name, face market fluctuations and operational risks.
For AI, the risks differ but are just as real. Over-reliance on automation could create blind spots. If treasury teams delegate too much to algorithms, they might overlook anomalies or strategic shifts requiring human input. The balance between efficiency and control is still being refined.
The trend is unmistakable. Stablecoins are here, whether organisations are ready or not. AI is already part of many financial tools, even if its full potential hasn’t been realized. The challenge isn’t whether to adopt these technologies—it’s how to do so responsibly and turn technological change into strategic advantage.
Absa’s clients illustrate this divide. Some have started testing stablecoin payments outside Africa, exploring use cases in less restrictive markets. Others remain cautious, weighing costs and risks. The pattern isn’t unique to Africa. Globally, treasuries are moving at different speeds, but the direction is the same: toward faster, more flexible financial operations.
What’s changing isn’t just the tools—it’s the approach. Treasury teams now see processes as adaptable, not fixed. That shift may be the most important transformation happening today.
Leave a Reply